Self and Peer Evaluation Form
HS 121
Helms

IF MICROSOFT OUTLOOK IS YOUR DEFAULT E-MAIL CLIENT, THIS FORM WILL NOT WORK. YOU WILL NEED TO COMPLETE THE .DOC OR .RTF VERSION OF THIS FORM FOUND IN THE ASSIGNMENTS AREA OF BLACKBOARD.
You will be evaluating either three or four of your classmates, plus yourself, thus there are five, separate sections. Please ignore the section for Peer Evaluation #4, if there are only four members in your group.
There will be nine criteria in which you will evaluate your peer's, and your own participation in the discussion areas. Please be fair and honest in your evaluation of this person's contribution and your own.
Please don't forget to type the name of the person you are evaluating in each of the boxes provided. Also, please don't forget to total the points for each of the individuals you evaluate and yourself.

Using a scale of 0-5 for the first eight areas, and a scale of 0-10 for the last area, assess each person's contribution to the discussion area throughout the course of the semester based upon the criteria provided.

Self Evaluation:

I posted a quality message in the discussion area devoted to Limiting Behaviors.

5 = Excellent. The message clearly stated a behavior limiting the quality of their health
4 = Above average. A good post, but lacking information.
3 = Average. They fulfilled their responsibility.
1-2 = Below Average. Post lacks substance.
0= No post

I posted two replies in the discussion area devoted to Motivation for Exercise.

5 = Excellent. The replies were substantive and provide valuable feedback.
4 = Above average. The replies were quality, but lacking depth and substance.
3 = Average. The two replies fulfilled their responsibility.
1-2 = Below Average. Only one response.
0= No replies.

I posted a quality message in the discussion area devoted to drug legalization.

5 = Excellent. The message clearly took a position and defended the position
4 = Above average. A good post, but lacking any conviction.
3 = Average. They fulfilled their responsibility.
1-2 = Below Average. Post lacks substance.
0= No post

I posted a quality message in the discussion area devoted to sex education.

5 = Excellent. The message clearly took a position and defended the position
4 = Above average. A good post, but lacking any conviction.
3 = Average. They fulfilled their responsibility.
1-2 = Below Average. Post lacks substance.
0= No post.

I posted two replies to the discussion thread Causes of Stress.

5 = Excellent. The replies were substantive and provide valuable feedback.
4 = Above average. The replies were quality, but lacking depth and substance.
3 = Average. The two replies fulfilled their responsibility.
1-2 = Below Average. Only one response.
0= No replies.

I posted a complete description of a fad diet.

5 = Yes
0= No

I posted a reply to the discussion entitled How to Spend a Buck.

5 = Excellent. The post took a position and defended it.
4 = Above average. The post took a position with a mild defense.
3 = Average. The post took a position with little defense.
1-2 = Below Average. The post lacked conviction and/or reason.
0= No Post.

I posted a synopsis of either a cancer type, or cardiovascular disease risk factors.

5 = Excellent. The synopsis was thorough and included details related to causes and cures.
4 = Above average. A good post, but lacking specific details.
3 = Average. They fulfilled their responsibility.
1-2 = Below Average. Post lacks substance.
0= No post.



My overall contribution to the discussion area was

9-10 = Excellent. Consistently posted and replied to almost all discussions.
6-8 = Above average. Posted and replied to many discussions.
4-5 = Average. Did the job, but nothing more.
1-3 = Below Average. Few posts and very few replies.
0= Non-existent.


Total Points


Peer Evaluation #1:

This person posted a quality message in the discussion area devoted to Limiting Behaviors.

5 = Excellent. The message clearly stated a behavior limiting the quality of their health
4 = Above average. A good post, but lacking information.
3 = Average. They fulfilled their responsibility.
1-2 = Below Average. Post lacks substance.
0= No post

This person posted two replies in the discussion area devoted to Motivation for Exercise.

5 = Excellent. The replies were substantive and provide valuable feedback.
4 = Above average. The replies were quality, but lacking depth and substance.
3 = Average. The two replies fulfilled their responsibility.
1-2 = Below Average. Only one response.
0= No replies.

This person posted a quality message in the discussion area devoted to drug legalization.

5 = Excellent. The message clearly took a position and defended the position
4 = Above average. A good post, but lacking any conviction.
3 = Average. They fulfilled their responsibility.
1-2 = Below Average. Post lacks substance.
0= No post

This person posted a quality message in the discussion area devoted to sex education.

5 = Excellent. The message clearly took a position and defended the position
4 = Above average. A good post, but lacking any conviction.
3 = Average. They fulfilled their responsibility.
1-2 = Below Average. Post lacks substance.
0= No post.

This person posted two replies to the discussion thread Causes of Stress.

5 = Excellent. The replies were substantive and provide valuable feedback.
4 = Above average. The replies were quality, but lacking depth and substance.
3 = Average. The two replies fulfilled their responsibility.
1-2 = Below Average. Only one response.
0= No replies.

This person posted a complete description of a fad diet.

5 = Yes
0= No

This person posted a reply to the discussion entitled How to Spend a Buck.

5 = Excellent. The post took a position and defended it.
4 = Above average. The post took a position with a mild defense.
3 = Average. The post took a position with little defense.
1-2 = Below Average. The post lacked conviction and/or reason.
0= No Post.

This person posted a synopsis of either a cancer type, or cardiovascular disease risk factors.

5 = Excellent. The synopsis was thorough and included details related to causes and cures.
4 = Above average. A good post, but lacking specific details.
3 = Average. They fulfilled their responsibility.
1-2 = Below Average. Post lacks substance.
0= No post.



This person's overall contribution to the discussion area was

9-10 = Excellent. Consistently posted and replied to almost all discussions.
6-8 = Above average. Posted and replied to many discussions.
4-5 = Average. Did the job, but nothing more.
1-3 = Below Average. Few posts and very few replies.
0= Non-existent.


Total Points


Peer Evaluation #2:

This person posted a quality message in the discussion area devoted to Limiting Behaviors.

5 = Excellent. The message clearly stated a behavior limiting the quality of their health
4 = Above average. A good post, but lacking information.
3 = Average. They fulfilled their responsibility.
1-2 = Below Average. Post lacks substance.
0= No post

This person posted two replies in the discussion area devoted to Motivation for Exercise.

5 = Excellent. The replies were substantive and provide valuable feedback.
4 = Above average. The replies were quality, but lacking depth and substance.
3 = Average. The two replies fulfilled their responsibility.
1-2 = Below Average. Only one response.
0= No replies.

This person posted a quality message in the discussion area devoted to drug legalization.

5 = Excellent. The message clearly took a position and defended the position
4 = Above average. A good post, but lacking any conviction.
3 = Average. They fulfilled their responsibility.
1-2 = Below Average. Post lacks substance.
0= No post

This person posted a quality message in the discussion area devoted to sex education.

5 = Excellent. The message clearly took a position and defended the position
4 = Above average. A good post, but lacking any conviction.
3 = Average. They fulfilled their responsibility.
1-2 = Below Average. Post lacks substance.
0= No post.

This person posted two replies to the discussion thread Causes of Stress.

5 = Excellent. The replies were substantive and provide valuable feedback.
4 = Above average. The replies were quality, but lacking depth and substance.
3 = Average. The two replies fulfilled their responsibility.
1-2 = Below Average. Only one response.
0= No replies.

This person posted a complete description of a fad diet.

5 = Yes
0= No

This person posted a reply to the discussion entitled How to Spend a Buck.

5 = Excellent. The post took a position and defended it.
4 = Above average. The post took a position with a mild defense.
3 = Average. The post took a position with little defense.
1-2 = Below Average. The post lacked conviction and/or reason.
0= No Post.

This person posted a synopsis of either a cancer type, or cardiovascular disease risk factors.

5 = Excellent. The synopsis was thorough and included details related to causes and cures.
4 = Above average. A good post, but lacking specific details.
3 = Average. They fulfilled their responsibility.
1-2 = Below Average. Post lacks substance.
0= No post.



This person's overall contribution to the discussion area was

9-10 = Excellent. Consistently posted and replied to almost all discussions.
6-8 = Above average. Posted and replied to many discussions.
4-5 = Average. Did the job, but nothing more.
1-3 = Below Average. Few posts and very few replies.
0= Non-existent.


Total Points


Peer Evaluation #3:

This person posted a quality message in the discussion area devoted to Limiting Behaviors.

5 = Excellent. The message clearly stated a behavior limiting the quality of their health
4 = Above average. A good post, but lacking information.
3 = Average. They fulfilled their responsibility.
1-2 = Below Average. Post lacks substance.
0= No post

This person posted two replies in the discussion area devoted to Motivation for Exercise.

5 = Excellent. The replies were substantive and provide valuable feedback.
4 = Above average. The replies were quality, but lacking depth and substance.
3 = Average. The two replies fulfilled their responsibility.
1-2 = Below Average. Only one response.
0= No replies.

This person posted a quality message in the discussion area devoted to drug legalization.

5 = Excellent. The message clearly took a position and defended the position
4 = Above average. A good post, but lacking any conviction.
3 = Average. They fulfilled their responsibility.
1-2 = Below Average. Post lacks substance.
0= No post

This person posted a quality message in the discussion area devoted to sex education.

5 = Excellent. The message clearly took a position and defended the position
4 = Above average. A good post, but lacking any conviction.
3 = Average. They fulfilled their responsibility.
1-2 = Below Average. Post lacks substance.
0= No post.

This person posted two replies to the discussion thread Causes of Stress.

5 = Excellent. The replies were substantive and provide valuable feedback.
4 = Above average. The replies were quality, but lacking depth and substance.
3 = Average. The two replies fulfilled their responsibility.
1-2 = Below Average. Only one response.
0= No replies.

This person posted a complete description of a fad diet.

5 = Yes
0= No

This person posted a reply to the discussion entitled How to Spend a Buck.

5 = Excellent. The post took a position and defended it.
4 = Above average. The post took a position with a mild defense.
3 = Average. The post took a position with little defense.
1-2 = Below Average. The post lacked conviction and/or reason.
0= No Post.

This person posted a synopsis of either a cancer type, or cardiovascular disease risk factors.

5 = Excellent. The synopsis was thorough and included details related to causes and cures.
4 = Above average. A good post, but lacking specific details.
3 = Average. They fulfilled their responsibility.
1-2 = Below Average. Post lacks substance.
0= No post.



This person's overall contribution to the discussion area was

9-10 = Excellent. Consistently posted and replied to almost all discussions.
6-8 = Above average. Posted and replied to many discussions.
4-5 = Average. Did the job, but nothing more.
1-3 = Below Average. Few posts and very few replies.
0= Non-existent.


Total Points


Peer Evaluation #4:

This person posted a quality message in the discussion area devoted to Limiting Behaviors.

5 = Excellent. The message clearly stated a behavior limiting the quality of their health
4 = Above average. A good post, but lacking information.
3 = Average. They fulfilled their responsibility.
1-2 = Below Average. Post lacks substance.
0= No post

This person posted two replies in the discussion area devoted to Motivation for Exercise.

5 = Excellent. The replies were substantive and provide valuable feedback.
4 = Above average. The replies were quality, but lacking depth and substance.
3 = Average. The two replies fulfilled their responsibility.
1-2 = Below Average. Only one response.
0= No replies.

This person posted a quality message in the discussion area devoted to drug legalization.

5 = Excellent. The message clearly took a position and defended the position
4 = Above average. A good post, but lacking any conviction.
3 = Average. They fulfilled their responsibility.
1-2 = Below Average. Post lacks substance.
0= No post

This person posted a quality message in the discussion area devoted to sex education.

5 = Excellent. The message clearly took a position and defended the position
4 = Above average. A good post, but lacking any conviction.
3 = Average. They fulfilled their responsibility.
1-2 = Below Average. Post lacks substance.
0= No post.

This person posted two replies to the discussion thread Causes of Stress.

5 = Excellent. The replies were substantive and provide valuable feedback.
4 = Above average. The replies were quality, but lacking depth and substance.
3 = Average. The two replies fulfilled their responsibility.
1-2 = Below Average. Only one response.
0= No replies.

This person posted a complete description of a fad diet.

5 = Yes
0= No

This person posted a reply to the discussion entitled How to Spend a Buck.

5 = Excellent. The post took a position and defended it.
4 = Above average. The post took a position with a mild defense.
3 = Average. The post took a position with little defense.
1-2 = Below Average. The post lacked conviction and/or reason.
0= No Post.

This person posted a synopsis of either a cancer type, or cardiovascular disease risk factors.

5 = Excellent. The synopsis was thorough and included details related to causes and cures.
4 = Above average. A good post, but lacking specific details.
3 = Average. They fulfilled their responsibility.
1-2 = Below Average. Post lacks substance.
0= No post.



This person's overall contribution to the discussion area was

9-10 = Excellent. Consistently posted and replied to almost all discussions.
6-8 = Above average. Posted and replied to many discussions.
4-5 = Average. Did the job, but nothing more.
1-3 = Below Average. Few posts and very few replies.
0= Non-existent.


Total Points


Peer Evaluation #5:

This person posted a quality message in the discussion area devoted to Limiting Behaviors.

5 = Excellent. The message clearly stated a behavior limiting the quality of their health
4 = Above average. A good post, but lacking information.
3 = Average. They fulfilled their responsibility.
1-2 = Below Average. Post lacks substance.
0= No post

This person posted two replies in the discussion area devoted to Motivation for Exercise.

5 = Excellent. The replies were substantive and provide valuable feedback.
4 = Above average. The replies were quality, but lacking depth and substance.
3 = Average. The two replies fulfilled their responsibility.
1-2 = Below Average. Only one response.
0= No replies.

This person posted a quality message in the discussion area devoted to drug legalization.

5 = Excellent. The message clearly took a position and defended the position
4 = Above average. A good post, but lacking any conviction.
3 = Average. They fulfilled their responsibility.
1-2 = Below Average. Post lacks substance.
0= No post

This person posted a quality message in the discussion area devoted to sex education.

5 = Excellent. The message clearly took a position and defended the position
4 = Above average. A good post, but lacking any conviction.
3 = Average. They fulfilled their responsibility.
1-2 = Below Average. Post lacks substance.
0= No post.

This person posted two replies to the discussion thread Causes of Stress.

5 = Excellent. The replies were substantive and provide valuable feedback.
4 = Above average. The replies were quality, but lacking depth and substance.
3 = Average. The two replies fulfilled their responsibility.
1-2 = Below Average. Only one response.
0= No replies.

This person posted a complete description of a fad diet.

5 = Yes
0= No

This person posted a reply to the discussion entitled How to Spend a Buck.

5 = Excellent. The post took a position and defended it.
4 = Above average. The post took a position with a mild defense.
3 = Average. The post took a position with little defense.
1-2 = Below Average. The post lacked conviction and/or reason.
0= No Post.

This person posted a synopsis of either a cancer type, or cardiovascular disease risk factors.

5 = Excellent. The synopsis was thorough and included details related to causes and cures.
4 = Above average. A good post, but lacking specific details.
3 = Average. They fulfilled their responsibility.
1-2 = Below Average. Post lacks substance.
0= No post.



This person's overall contribution to the discussion area was

9-10 = Excellent. Consistently posted and replied to almost all discussions.
6-8 = Above average. Posted and replied to many discussions.
4-5 = Average. Did the job, but nothing more.
1-3 = Below Average. Few posts and very few replies.
0= Non-existent.


Total Points

 


WARNING Please Read: This form uses e-mail to submit the answers you have provided. Please select okay (yes) when asked if you want to submit this form using your e-mail program. Remember, if Microsoft Outlook is your preferred e-mail program, you cannot send this form. A second window may ask if you want to send the message, please select send the message. PLEASE ONLY CLICK THE SUBMIT BUTTON ONE TIME. I will let you know within 48 hours if I received your evaluations.